How to Spot Fake Nike Sb Dunk Low Born X Raised in 2023

Box Label

Dype meticulously breaks down the intricate distinctions between genuine and counterfeit iterations, commencing with an insightful examination of the box designs. One of the most telling markers lies in the design of the box itself. The imitations persist in using a dated box version, whereas the genuine articles are gracefully presented in boxes drenched in delicate shades of cream or sail. Furthermore, a critical point to emphasize is the precise description of the label. Upon closer inspection, the counterfeit's box label description is riddled with inaccuracies, with even the superfluous SRP tab still glaringly present. In contrast, authentic versions have evolved, completely discarding these outdated, perforated labels.

Side Panel

Turning our attention to the side profile, the differences become even more palpable, revealing two critical distinctions that set the genuine apart from its counterfeit counterpart. The first, a captivating study in color nuance, shows the replica draped in a shade notably deeper and darker, while the authentic pair parades in a more subtle, lighter tone. Yet, the distinction doesn't end there. The material of the swoosh emerges as another vital point of differentiation. On the genuine pair, the swoosh exudes an ethereal iridescence, reminiscent of a shimmering gem, whereas its imposter counterpart is content with a simple, unvaried shade of sky blue. This side profile inspection alone offers an illuminating lens into the world of authenticity versus imitation.

Footbed

Through careful examination, the stitching on the genuine pairs showcases remarkable consistency, a testament to its premium make. In stark contrast, the stitching on the counterfeit pair is so constricting that it results in unsightly holes perforating the footbed. This tightness is noticeably absent in the authentic pairs, underscoring the finesse of genuine craftsmanship. Furthermore, an astute observer would note that the correct perforation hue should echo a subtle pinkish tone, harmonizing perfectly with the outer pylon. This depth of detail speaks volumes about the meticulous construction of the genuine article versus its lesser imitation.

Back Insole

he reverse side of the insoles serves as another revealing touchstone in our quest to differentiate the genuine from the counterfeit. To the casual observer, these nuances might elude detection, but with a keener gaze, the disparities begin to emerge. One of the immediate deviations lies in the feel and look of the forefoot pads. On the replicas, they lack the luxurious plushness characteristic of the authentic pairs, settling for a more rigid and flat facade. Beyond that, another telling sign is the engraving of the size on the insole. The imprints on the replicas are glaringly pronounced, almost as if shouting their discrepancies, whereas the genuine pairs showcase subtler and more refined engravings.

Insole Print

One's gaze is immediately drawn to the distinct variations in the font and the spaces between letters. On the authentic pair, each letter sits in defined elegance, with adequate breathing space between them, exuding a refined clarity in its imprint. However, when observed against this backdrop, the counterfeits fall short. Their lettering huddles uncomfortably close, with spacing that feels askew and lacks the meticulous precision seen in the genuine pairs. This nuanced difference in typography serves as yet another testimony to the superior craftsmanship of the authentic over the replicated.

Toe Box

Checking the toe box. We can definitely say that the flower-like design perforations for the replicated pair are larger, while real pairs are smaller in diameter.

Tongue Label

The embroidery, done meticulously one block at a time, is where the first deviation arises. The font used on the counterfeit pairs is conspicuously bulkier, missing the finesse of genuine craftsmanship. Further amplifying the differences is the stitching technique employed on the tongue label. A pristine look at the retail pairs reveals straight lines with evenly spaced double stitches—a mark of skilled artisanship. However, when juxtaposed against this, the stitch pattern on the Unauthorized Authentic (UA) pair stands out as an aberration.

Inside Label

A studied glance at the lettering showcases the disparities: the counterfeit pair's letters stretch taller and appear more slender, lacking the proportionate balance seen in the retail versions.

Further down, beneath the pink logo, the stitching emerges as another telling marker. In the genuine pairs, the thread work is robust, with each stitch bold and emphatic. The replicas, on the other hand, display frailty in their stitches - they're thin and waver in consistency.

Capping off our observations, the overall hue of the replica label errs on the side of darkness, presenting a shade of blue that's discernibly deeper than the authentic pair's true hue.

Front

Casting a discerning eye upon the iconic "One Block at a Time" embroidery adorning the toe guards, one can immediately spot a few subtle yet critical deviations. Most notably, the placement of this signature embroidery seems to waver, especially in smaller sizes. However, what's commendable is the unwavering consistency in the cursive pattern and font across all genuine sneakers.

Zeroing in on specific letters, the 'B' and 'A' provide a clear lens into the world of authenticity versus imitation. For those with a keen eye for detail, the Unauthorized Authentic (UA) pair's font exhibits a pronounced boldness, overshadowing the more delicately crafted font of the authentic pair.

Heel Logo

The logo on the genuine pairs exudes a sense of precision; its outlines are sharp and the embroidery boasts a neatness that speaks of masterful craftsmanship.

However, when contrasted against this backdrop, the counterfeit heel logo falls markedly short. Particularly, the face portion of the logo appears distorted, lacking the clarity and definition seen in its authentic counterpart. For ease of identification, these discrepancies have been highlighted: a red circle envelops the flawed aspects of the replica, while a yellow circle accentuates the pristine quality of the retail version.

Lace Prints

Concluding our meticulous examination, we turn our attention to the poignant "In Loving Memory" prints adorning the laces. The genuine pairs showcase prints that are crisply defined, resonating with a clarity that’s emblematic of their premium make.

In stark contrast, the imprints on the Unauthorized Authentic (UA) laces leave much to be desired. Not only do they lack the sharp definition of the real ones, but their print quality is also notably inferior. These replica prints are prone to flakiness and, alarmingly, can be effortlessly erased, further distinguishing them from the enduring quality of authentic lace prints.

Note: Not all replicas are the same and we limit our comparison based on the data posted.

To ensure the utmost accuracy and convenience, we encourage you to download our App, available on both IOS and Playstore platforms. Our App is specifically designed to assist you in verifying the authenticity of your sneakers, providing you with a reliable and efficient tool for your peace of mind.