How To Spot FAKE Air Jordan 4 OG Bred in 2023

Box Label

Now, let's meticulously examine the Jordan 4 Bred OG 2023's label. To facilitate this process, I've highlighted specific differences for you: the authentic versions are marked in vivid yellow, while the replicas bear a striking red mark.

At first glance, the "10.5" size notation beneath the "US" looks spot-on. Yet, when observed closely, the curvature of the zero in the replica is distinctly more rounded compared to its authentic counterpart.

Another glaring discrepancy lies in the detailing of "Jordan.com" and the iconic "Jump Man". The font used for "Jordan.com" on the replica is noticeably slender, creating more spacing between the characters. This deviation is again evident in the "Jump Man" color. Moreover, the silhouette of the "Jump Man" on the replica lacks the sharpness and definition that the authentic version boasts. This fine-tuning in the design gives away the authenticity of the pair at hand.

Examining another box label, we find further evidence of deviations that can aid in discerning the authenticity of the product. Upon careful scrutiny, one can observe that the descriptions on the label are misaligned, subtly veering off their intended straight path.

Moreover, the iconic "Jump Man" print, a hallmark of authenticity, exhibits glaring discrepancies when juxtaposed against its retail counterpart. One of the most discernible inconsistencies lies in the silhouette of the "Jump Man." Instead of the well-defined separation, we expect between the neck and shoulders, they seem to meld into one another in an inelegant fusion on the replica, starkly highlighting the compromised definition.

Rear

Among the replicas inspected thus far, this specific iteration undeniably stands out as remarkably faithful to its authentic counterpart. However, there exists a single, albeit significant, distinction deserving of our attention: the presence of double stitching positioned just above the "Nike" emblem.

To further check this discrepancy, a conspicuous yellow oval draws our gaze to the region where precision is paramount. Authentic versions exhibit a distinctive trait: the double stitching appears compact, each stitch meticulously close to its counterpart. In contrast, a meticulous comparison reveals that the spacing between stitches in the replica is notably more generous, betraying the subtle but crucial difference that sets genuine products apart from their imitations.

Tongue Label

As alluded to during the prior discourse on the rear section, it becomes evident that among the range of replicas under scrutiny, this particular iteration emerges as the one that bears the closest resemblance to the authentic model.

However, the focal point of analysis now shifts to the intricate structure of the tongue. Here, a significant distinction surfaces: an observable red lining, meticulously preserved in the genuine pair, reveals itself in a more prominent manner. In stark contrast, the replica falls short in this aspect, displaying a red lining that remains somewhat concealed. This nuanced difference emphasizes the careful attention to detail required when discerning between authentic and replicated versions.

Back Insoles

The back insoles for the retail pair and the fake pair are almost the same. Notice the inscriptions for the replicated pair looks more pronounced compared with the authentic pair.

Beware and check that ® under the MS10.5 on the replicas, the trademark is not present with the authentics, however, this is a weak indicator when checking for authenticity,

Size Label

As we journey into the intimate recesses of the sneaker, our attention is drawn to the nuanced variations in the size tags. Highlighted meticulously with a yellow circle and rectangle for the authentic pair, these indicators guide our visual comparison. A striking difference is unveiled in the font's robustness. The genuine tag boasts a pronounced, substantial font, whereas the font on the replicated pair appears noticeably leaner and less bold, emphasizing the distinctions between authenticity and imitation.

Side Panel

Highlighted with a distinctive yellow rectangle, our focus is drawn to a specific region of the sneaker. In the genuine pairs, this designated area is more compact, revealing a notable difference from the Unauthorized Authentic (UA) versions. The counterfeit pairs, it appears, have not been scaled with precision.

Further, when juxtaposed side-by-side, the midsoles of the two pairs reveal contrasting characteristics. The replica's midsoles possess a smooth, almost glossy finish. In stark contrast, the genuine pairs exhibit a more textured surface, enriched with a discernible pattern reminiscent of brush strokes. This variance in texture and sheen provides another layer of distinction between the authentic and the imitation.

Insole Print

When closely examining the insole prints, certain disparities become vividly apparent. The typography employed for the genuine pair is characterized by its robust and unambiguous font, emanating clarity and precision. In contrast, the imitated pair's typography is noticeably leaner, lacking the confident boldness of its authentic counterpart. Furthermore, the word "AIR" stands out peculiarly; it seems the counterfeit version employs two distinct fonts for this single word, further accentuating the discrepancies between the genuine and the replicated.

Footbed

Delving into the intricate intricacies of the footbeds, our scrutiny uncovers a shared feature in both pairs: the presence of black thread stitching. Curiously, a rather paradoxical pattern emerges—the replicated pair, against expectation, frequently exhibits a cleaner finish compared to its retail counterpart. Astonishing as it may be, it appears that retail pairs can sometimes be characterized by an unintended untidiness in this particular aspect. Often, excess paint marks the retail pairs, marking a departure from the meticulous precision one might anticipate.

Intriguingly, there exists a noteworthy clue to authenticity within the midst of this analysis: the size notation imprinted alongside a Chinese character on the footbed. This distinguishing mark is enclosed within a distinct red circle, serving as a crucial indicator of authenticity amid the myriad of details.

Hang Tag

The authentic hang tag emerges draped in a deeper shade, standing in stark contrast to the lighter-toned replica. Delving beyond the visual, the touch reveals another distinction. The font for the real hang tag is bolder when compared side by side. The genuine hang tag also has more texture, adding to its authenticity. In contrast, the replica tag feels noticeably smoother, lacking the tactile richness of its genuine counterpart.

Toe Box

Upon examining the toe box, its form is so impeccably mirrored between the two pairs that it becomes nearly impossible to discern any distinction. Yet, as our attention shifts to the intricacies of the netting, a difference begins to unfurl. The authentic pair boasts netting that glistens with a glossy sheen and feels luxuriously plush to the touch. In stark contrast, the counterfeit pair's netting loses its luster, culminating in a muted matte finish that lacks the refined elegance of the genuine article.

Note: Not all replicas are the same and we limit our comparison based on the data posted.

To ensure the utmost accuracy and convenience, we encourage you to download our App, available on both IOS and Playstore platforms. Our App is specifically designed to assist you in verifying the authenticity of your sneakers, providing you with a reliable and efficient tool for your peace of mind.